Editorial Policies

  1. Creative Commons License
  2. COPE Recommendation for Conflict of Interest (specific to editors)
  3. Publisher Policies
  4. Editorial Process
  5. COPE Recommendation for Plagiarism
  6. Advertisement Policies
  7. Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures (specific to editors)
  8. Editorial Policies
  9. Peer Review Process
  10. Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

1. Creative Commons License

The Creative Commons License ensures that all articles published by the journal are openly accessible and can be freely shared, distributed, and reused. The most common license applied is CC BY (Attribution), which allows users to adapt the content, provided they give proper credit to the original authors. This open access model promotes greater dissemination of research, enabling knowledge to reach a wider audience globally.

2. COPE Recommendation for Conflict of Interest (Specific to Editors)

The COPE Recommendation for Conflict of Interest (Specific to Editors) provides clear guidelines for editors on how to manage conflicts of interest in the editorial process. Editors must disclose any financial, professional, or personal relationships that may influence their impartiality in the decision-making process. If a conflict arises, editors are required to recuse themselves from handling the manuscript to ensure a fair and unbiased review.

3. Publisher Policies

The Publisher Policies define the rights and responsibilities of the publisher and the editorial team. These policies include guidelines on ethical publishing practices, copyright management, open access, and publication fees. The publisher is committed to ensuring that all articles are disseminated in accordance with academic standards and relevant legal requirements. This includes supporting digital preservation and ensuring that content is accessible globally.

4. Editorial Process

The Editorial Process includes the steps followed by the editorial team from the initial manuscript submission to final publication. This process typically includes screening for plagiarism, peer review, manuscript revisions, and final acceptance. The editorial team is responsible for overseeing the quality, integrity, and accuracy of all published content. The journal follows a clear and transparent procedure to maintain consistency and fairness in editorial decisions.

5. COPE Recommendation for Plagiarism

The COPE Recommendation for Plagiarism provides guidelines for handling plagiarism in submitted manuscripts. The journal is committed to maintaining high standards of academic integrity. Authors are expected to submit original research, and any detected plagiarism is taken seriously. The editorial team uses plagiarism detection tools to screen submissions, and manuscripts found to contain plagiarized content will be rejected. COPE’s guidelines provide a framework for addressing plagiarism, including the possibility of retracting articles if the misconduct is identified after publication.

The Advertisement Policies govern how the journal handles advertisements and sponsored content. The journal maintains editorial independence, ensuring that advertisements do not influence the content or decisions of the editorial team. Advertisements are clearly distinguished from the editorial content, and their placement is subject to review. The journal ensures that all advertisements align with its mission and ethical standards.

7. Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures (Specific to Editors)

The Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures policy for editors ensures that editorial decisions are made impartially. Editors must disclose any potential conflicts, including personal, professional, or financial relationships with authors, reviewers, or research topics. This disclosure is critical to maintaining the transparency of the editorial process. In cases of conflict, editors are required to step down from the decision-making process for affected manuscripts.

8. Editorial Policies

The Editorial Policies provide the framework for how the editorial board functions and makes decisions regarding manuscript submission, review, and publication. The editorial board follows strict guidelines to ensure that manuscripts are assessed fairly and in accordance with the journal’s scope. The policies cover issues such as manuscript formatting, ethical standards, and conflict resolution. These policies are aimed at maintaining the credibility of the journal and ensuring consistency in the decision-making process.

9. Peer Review Process

The Peer Review Process is integral to the journal’s commitment to academic rigor and quality. The journal follows a double-blind peer review process, meaning both the reviewers and authors are anonymous to each other. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise in the relevant field, and their feedback plays a crucial role in the editorial decision. The journal aims to provide constructive feedback to authors and ensure that only high-quality research is published. The review process also helps prevent biases, conflicts of interest, and inaccuracies in the articles.

10. Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

The Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement outlines the ethical standards and practices that authors, reviewers, and editors must adhere to in the publication process. This statement includes guidelines on plagiarism, authorship, conflicts of interest, and the handling of complaints or ethical issues. The journal commits to upholding the integrity of the academic record by addressing any cases of misconduct transparently. The statement ensures that all parties involved in the publication process act ethically and in the best interests of the research community.